The community
A standard owned by one author is not a standard.
This is the working space around Defensible AI: question the framework, improve the anchors, and help make the R-Score a measure that travels across industries and borders. Use it, break it, tell us where it fails. That is how shared measures get built.
Ask the author
Put a question about the book, the framework, or a governance problem you're facing. Selected questions are answered publicly (anonymised on request).
Suggest improvements
Challenge the scoring anchors, propose a better behavioural definition, or report where the heuristic broke in practice. Credited contributions shape future editions.
Standardisation working group
A practitioner group working toward a published, auditable, industry-neutral R-Score specification: shared anchors, validation methods, and sector profiles.
Lane 1
Ask the author
Lane 2
Suggest an improvement
Lane 3
The R-Score Standardisation Working Group
The goal: a bounded, anchored, openly published specification any organisation, vendor, or regulator can score against, with sector profiles and an audit method for validating a claimed C. Founding members shape the first draft.
Live
Questions & answers
Approved questions from the community, answered by the author. Submit yours above; it appears here once reviewed.
House rules
How we collaborate
Evidence over opinion
Claims about anchors and scores come with the observation behind them.
Critique the work, not the person
Hard questions welcome. Discourtesy isn't.
Open by default
The specification stays openly published. Contributions are credited.